The only thing I've run into trouble with is the rejection. The standard, boring, and quite obviously not right for our journal rejections have all been easy. It's a simple, thank you but it doesn't work for us. The trouble I'm having is with the things that almost worked for me, but didn't quite. I have time and I love to edit (and I'm excellent at it) so I've been sending back suggestions along with those pieces I rejected but felt could be improved.
You'd think poets and writers would love some free, supportive feedback.
Not always the case. For example, one person (with a BA and MFA in creative writing) responded to my comments that her piece felt more like a travel excerpt than a piece of creative non-fiction (because it literally just described the author going from one place to another with a friend, and nothing really happened) with the following email response:
As someone who (I would assume) graduated from both a Bachelor's and Master's program in creative writing, you would think she would understand that a) rejection is not personal and b) responding in an unprofessional way to a potential editor or publisher is just plain bad business strategy. So, I send back a response of my own, just in case I misunderstood:
Katie,In your case, ignorance is not bliss.ThanksCecile Sarruf
Hi Cecile,
I'm not sure if you intended for this to be insulting, but I suggest that you refrain from sending emails like this to editors and publishers in the future as it is very unprofessional. If you have questions about my comments, I would be happy to clarify, especially if you think I misunderstood your intent. My job, as the primary editor of Saltwater Press, is to look for work that best meets the goals of our journal. While this piece was not a right fit for us, you might have better luck elsewhere. And I do wish you the best of luck.
Katie McClendon, Editor
Saltwater Press
I meant it with all sincerity. But, Cecile did not seem to think that I had the best intention in mind. So she sent me this:
Katie,I will not be restricted by anyone in the manner of which I choose to respond to my emails. Do not advice me on what is considered "professional" or not, I did not ask you.You did not understand my piece and that is final.Thank you,Cecile
Well, there you have it folks. A day in life of a literary magazine editor, just starting out. I find it funny when authors refuse to be accountable when someone "does not understand" their piece. Isn't this the point of writing? To communicate your message to another person with little or no misinterpretation? Isn't it then the goal of the author to eliminate as much room for misinterpretation as possible? Is it really up to the reader alone to "understand" the piece?
As a writer, I think it is my job to make sure I am crafting my work in a way that makes sense and if a reader doesn't "get it", I take responsibility for that and I go back and edit. That's the work of it, isn't it? Otherwise, what makes writing an art form?
At the very least, I have learned a few tips from the people who have submitted about how not to do it. Thanks for that, Cecile.